338 wm vs 300wm

We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. While a few hunters insist that they know the best cartridge for elk hunting, most of us are still searching. This is the wrong approach.

This is Part 2 of a current series on competitive rifle cartridges for big game. The issue being that there is often competition between two popular big-game rifles that are so similar in ballistics, weight and handling, but shooting a different cartridge — so which one of the two should be chosen, and why, assuming there is only room for one more in the safe or money in a checking account? In P1 the contest was between a. I faced that dilemma several years ago in the selection of a popular magnum from the Ruger series with the Boat Paddle stock and SS barrelled action. The choice was between a.

338 wm vs 300wm

When it comes to putting down large game at longer ranges, most hunters will agree that the Winchester Magnum, Win Mag, and Lapua Magnum are more than up to the task. They all have a relatively flat trajectory and carry enough kinetic energy to get the job done on North American big game like mule deer, elk, moose, and bears. However, the ballisticians at Winchester and Lapua had different ideas surrounding the intended use of each cartridge and optimized certain aspects of each round to meet those goals. These differences can lead to confusion amongst new shooters as to which cartridge is best for their new hunting rifle. In this article, we will discuss the merits and shortcomings of the Win Mag , Win Mag and Lapua Mag and provide a clearer picture of how each cartridge fits into your shooting needs. In contrast, the Lapua Magnum descends from the older Rigby case, which was originally an African big game cartridge propelled using cordite. The Win Mag has a case length of 2. The Lapua is also a wider with a base diameter of 0. Another visual distinction between the three rifle cartridges is that the Winchester rounds retain their belt around the base of the case while the Lapua is a beltless cartridge. However, neither the Win Mag nor Win Mag exert pressures that require the use of a case belt. The Win Mag and Win Mag both have the same overall length of 3. The difference in case length and base diameter directly affects the case capacity for each cartridge. Another striking difference between these three rounds are the bullets that each cartridge fires.

Low level hunt now with exotic magnum guns and calibers is peanuts compared to the early days.

Hi gents, I've been wrestling with this one since the end of last season I've shot my brother's Win Mag Xbolt and it's excellent I have the same one in I'm not sold on but I've heard that it's a good, slightly longer range option over , and harder hitting power with a still fairly flat trajectory. I'm not worried about the kickback as I've shot Lapua too. Help me make my decision. Well, your.

When it comes to putting down large game at longer ranges, most hunters will agree that the Winchester Magnum, Win Mag, and Lapua Magnum are more than up to the task. They all have a relatively flat trajectory and carry enough kinetic energy to get the job done on North American big game like mule deer, elk, moose, and bears. However, the ballisticians at Winchester and Lapua had different ideas surrounding the intended use of each cartridge and optimized certain aspects of each round to meet those goals. These differences can lead to confusion amongst new shooters as to which cartridge is best for their new hunting rifle. In this article, we will discuss the merits and shortcomings of the Win Mag , Win Mag and Lapua Mag and provide a clearer picture of how each cartridge fits into your shooting needs.

338 wm vs 300wm

Many cartridges that have become popular with military snipers have also made the jump to outdoor sports and vice versa. Ballistics vs. Ballistics The. The necked-down. The MeatEater crew can confirm that a. But even though the trajectories of each cartridge are similar, the. Shootability vs.

Woolworths soy sauce

He has poorly hit a couple of elk but the has enough knock down power he was able to get a second shot into them and put them down where they were. Finally, the. My favorite cartridge. In P1 the contest was between a. That rifle wears a suppressor, so recoil is surprisingly light, but it hits game like a hammer. At about fps and ft-lbs — much more than a. Lead bullets are the main reason for magnumitis. Will a grain,. Thanks to their. Cartridge development is largely a matter of reshaping a few basic brass cases. While a few hunters insist that they know the best cartridge for elk hunting, most of us are still searching. March 15, , AM. All other things being equal, a bigger bullet will make a bigger hole, cause more tissue damage, and result in more blood loss. The Lyman 50th Edition p , and Hornady 10th Edition p, , reloading manuals were used as references for the history of the cartridges. I agree.

When it comes to long range shooting and big game hunting, two rifle cartridges that are always in the discussion are Winchester Magnum and Lapua Magnum.

Quote: The. The time now is AM. Find all posts by Sask Bearman. I shot a moose with a. For this reason, the Lapua has a flatter trajectory, penetrates better, and retains more kinetic energy at typical hunting ranges. Remember Me? I hear what your saying about bullet weights and indeed agree that if you want to shoot heavies the. The Lapua finds itself in an interesting spot when it comes to big game hunting. In the. Find all posts by north american hunter. Then I wanted to shoot partitions and Accubonds Materials and construction being the same, a longer, heavier bullet will penetrate better than a lighter one. The issue being that there is often competition between two popular big-game rifles that are so similar in ballistics, weight and handling, but shooting a different cartridge — so which one of the two should be chosen, and why, assuming there is only room for one more in the safe or money in a checking account?