Google pixel 2 vs dslr

The Google Pixel 2 XL has been grabbing all the headlines lately for its possibly less-impressive-than-expected-for-a-company-as-well-regarded-as-Google display quality.

I was going to take pictures solely with the Google Pixel 2. That was something that I considered, but not for very long. Having reviewed the Google Pixel 2 XL , I was astounded by the optics performance squeezed out of its cameras. In most situations, I actually felt at an advantage by shooting with the Pixel 2. Double-tapping the power button to get into the camera app was much simpler, faster and far less cumbersome than booting up a DSLR. Not to ding the tried-and-true camera type too much, but given we were usually out for 16 hours at a time each day, swapping batteries every few hours really would have been a pain. The Pixel 2 XL regularly put forward all-day battery performance as our trusty camera, along with being our guide on Google Maps.

Google pixel 2 vs dslr

.

Of course, depending upon how you plan to share your images, and what post-processing you plan on performing, you may or may not see any benefit from the increased resolution offered by DSLRs.

.

We also expanded our low-light testing and created the new Night sub-score, which incorporates the previous Flash score. We have retested this device using the new Wide and Night test protocols and updated the scores in this review, but we have not changed the text from the original review. For more information, please see the articles about our new Wide and Night test protocols. Its top scores in most of our traditional photo and video categories put it ahead of our previous tied leaders, the Apple iPhone 8 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, despite the Pixel 2 coming in lower in the new Zoom and Bokeh categories. The Pixel 2 is also a major step forward from the Pixel which was our top scorer when it was released a year ago , moving from 90 to About DxOMark Mobile tests : For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DxOMark engineers capture and evaluate over test images and more than 2 hours of video in both controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of the testing. For more information about the DxOMark Mobile test protocol, click here. The Google Pixel 2 not only takes the DxOMark Mobile scoring crown with a stunning Overall score of 98, but its video performance improves by 5 points over the original Pixel, putting it at 96 and at the top of our video ranking.

Google pixel 2 vs dslr

The Google Pixel 2 clues us in on why Google called its phone series Pixel: it was building the best camera on a phone. This second-generation effort fulfills that promise with not only the best-in-class photos, but also dual front-facing speakers and water-resistance. Find out more about how we test. While the Google Pixel 2 has been surpassed by the Google Pixel 3 , it remains a solid Android device at a lower price than its successor - perhaps even the affordable Google Pixel 3a. The older phone follows Google's design ethos, proving that two or three, or four rear cameras aren't always better than one on a phone — the photos it takes are that good, and we've got the proof below.

Finnick and annie

The Google Pixel 2 XL preformed much less well. Smartphones cannot focus on subjects this close to the lens. Therefore, a more precise testing method was needed. The image processing techniques used by the Pixel 2 XL allow the camera to capture detail in both light and dark areas of an image. In the two images above, the light provided by the Philips Hue system is augmented by a very bright photography flood light. If you try to ignore the stylistic differences, to my eye it would be hard to claim that the zoomed in section of the DSLR image has twice the detail of the zoomed in section from the Google Pixel 2 XL image, at least not in a noticeable way. This post is mostly an exploration into the benefits and drawbacks of using the Pixel 2 XL camera or the Nikon D in different situations and for different photography styles. Then, because the size of the resulting image was ridiculous, more than 16 times the size of a 4K display, I cropped out the middle of the image. A number of different techniques are used to increase low-light performance in smartphone cameras. In fact, I'm sure those results would have been even more breathtaking. If you are concerned with subjective image quality, colors, realism, lighting, or other factors used to evaluate an image, there are many, many other specifications to evaluate than resolution.

I was going to take pictures solely with the Google Pixel 2. That was something that I considered, but not for very long. Having reviewed the Google Pixel 2 XL , I was astounded by the optics performance squeezed out of its cameras.

So, there are several other example photos I elected not to post here because even from the two above, it is clear that the camera on the Pixel 2 XL cannot focus on subjects close enough to qualify the images as macro photography — at least not without accessories to boost the capabilities of the camera. Stop brushing your teeth just before bed, say sleep experts — here's why. At to Lux, the subject in these photos is still being illuminated by a photography flood light, but it is positioned farther from the subject than it was in the previous set of photos. Google Pixel 2 XL vs. In fact, I'm sure those results would have been even more breathtaking. North America. There's a mix of portrait mode captures and regular off-the-cuff photos below. But, the longer the exposure time, the greater the risk for distortions in the image resulting from the camera not being held perfectly still. Not to ding the tried-and-true camera type too much, but given we were usually out for 16 hours at a time each day, swapping batteries every few hours really would have been a pain. The Lux light level can be considered dark. Dyson's new vacuum and mop took all the hassle out of cleaning my new flat. When it comes to camera resolution, especially smartphone camera resolution, the resolution specs published by manufacturers are often, at best, taken out of context for most consumers. Although the Pixel 2 XL still captured a high-quality image, despite the extremely dim lighting in the environment for these photos, the DSLR photo does look better. For the DSLR, the darker the environment, the longer the exposure time.