R political discussion

A political r political discussion is an instance of a logical argument applied to politics. Political arguments are used by academicsmedia punditscandidates for political office, and government officials. Political arguments are also used by citizens in ordinary interactions to comment on and understand political events.

Although local government is a rich, important arena for understanding politics, local politics presents a few challenges for understanding and participating in it. To better explore comparative urban politics, we turn to reddit, a social media, news, and discussion platform. We ask if city subreddits are places of discussion of local politics and what can we learn about the salience of local topics, and about local politics, from the content of these subreddits. Using visualization and text analysis, we find that city subreddits are indeed forums for political discussion, finding that approximately a quarter of the topics on city subreddits are political in nature. We observe that people discuss matters including, but not limited to, taxation, policing and crime, homelessness, and education.

R political discussion

Thank you for visiting nature. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Here, we investigate their role in the debate around the US elections on Reddit, a fundamental platform for the success of Donald Trump. We identify Trump vs Clinton supporters and reconstruct their political interaction network. We observe a preference for cross-cutting political interactions between the two communities rather than within-group interactions, thus contradicting the echo chamber narrative. Furthermore, these interactions are asymmetrical: Clinton supporters are particularly eager to answer comments by Trump supporters. Beside asymmetric heterophily, users show assortative behavior for activity, and disassortative, asymmetric behavior for popularity. Our findings are tested against a null model of random interactions, by using two different approaches: a network rewiring which preserves the activity of nodes, and a logit regression which takes into account possible confounding factors. Finally, we explore possible socio-demographic implications. Users show a tendency for geographical homophily and a small positive correlation between cross-interactions and voter abstention.

As hypothesized, the association of segregation with toxicity became increasingly positive at higher levels of segregation.

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. Prevailing theories of partisan incivility on social media suggest that it derives from disagreement about political issues or from status competition between groups. This study—which analyzes the commenting behavior of Reddit users across diverse cultural contexts subreddits —tests the alternative hypothesis that such incivility derives in large part from a selection effect: Toxic people are especially likely to opt into discourse in partisan contexts. First, we examined commenting behavior across over 9, unique cultural contexts subreddits and confirmed that discourse is indeed more toxic in partisan e. Next, we analyzed hundreds of millions of comments from over 6.

Philip H. He has taught courses in research methods at the undergraduate and graduate levels for nearly 30 years. His main research interests are American public opinion, voting behavior, techniques of quantitative analysis, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. His recent research has been on the effectiveness of Internet-based instruction. Account Options Ieiet. An R Companion to Political Analysis.

R political discussion

Thank you for visiting nature. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Here, we investigate their role in the debate around the US elections on Reddit, a fundamental platform for the success of Donald Trump. We identify Trump vs Clinton supporters and reconstruct their political interaction network. We observe a preference for cross-cutting political interactions between the two communities rather than within-group interactions, thus contradicting the echo chamber narrative. Furthermore, these interactions are asymmetrical: Clinton supporters are particularly eager to answer comments by Trump supporters.

10 day weather forecast philadelphia pa

Your purchase has been completed. We ask if city subreddits are places of discussion of local politics and what can we learn about the salience of local topics, and about local politics, from the content of these subreddits. However, there may be a limit to the usefulness of theories drawing on assumptions about rationality when examining post-truth Perl et al. Brady WJ, et al.. Duca, J. This heightened anonymity may reduce socialization propensities, an intriguing direction for future research. Zalani, A. Cho, S. This loss-frame suggests that there is nothing to lose by being willfully ignorant or embracing outlandish claims and conspiracy theories. Atkinson, P. PLoS One 11 , e This is in very strong contrast to LA where discussion is almost exclusively on housing matters and not on law enforcement and violence. Mamakos and Finkel say this distorts public discourse and promotes combative partisanship at the expense of more civil and informed debate. For profanity , anger , politeness , prosociality , anxiety , and sadness , we employed the dictionary-based approach of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count LIWC Supplementary Materials.

.

Descent into a politics of payback and absurdity. Baumann, F. For example, during the Covid pandemic in the United States, medical experts like Dr. In the sampling strategy of negative links, we follow exactly the same procedure. Among other environmental factors, we also observed a correlation between the likelihood of cross-group connections and the fraction of the population that abstained from voting. Article Google Scholar Baumann, F. Recent articles have demonstrated consistency in hostile behavior in online and offline political discourse 21 , and that when prompted to comment on posts related to politics, people who have online political activity are more likely to exhibit toxic behavior than people who do not Any overtures to compromise are seen by post-truthers as weakness and betrayal. Gini coefficient : income inequality in the state, as measured by the Gini coefficient in data from the American Community Survey, conducted by the US Census Bureau. The present findings have important implications for theories of political polarization. As with any empirical work, our work presents some limitations. The social consequences of political anger. Article Google Scholar Conover, M. By looking at the correlation of opinions expressed by a user and opinions exposed to, they confirm the presence of echo chambers i. The incivility that the engaged partisans exhibit in contexts that are irrelevant to politics raises the concern that toxic behavior in partisan contexts might masquerade as righteousness or advocacy, but it is actually due in large part to these specific people's tendency to be uncivil in general.