Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Pretty much all Samsung users, snapdragon vs exynos processor, especially the ones who buy flagship Galaxy phones, complain that they don't want the company's native Exynos chip on their phone—and understandably so. After all, Exynos chips have historically proven to be grossly inferior to their Snapdragon counterparts.

Exynos vs Snapdragon. Which one to choose? This question is in the minds of all Android smartphone users. Read on find out which one is suitable for you. The Samsung Exynos vs Qualcomm Snapdragon is a competition that has been going on for many years now. While it could be argued that public perception favours Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, it cannot be denied that Samsung has made a lot of innovation when it comes to its own Exynos chipsets. Let's take a detailed look into what each one of them is good for, and which one is more suitable for your use.

Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption , but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. As expected, each generation nets performance improvements, but the results are an interesting look into the progression of smartphones over the years. About the data: The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. While Geekbench doesn't cover all aspects of a chipset, you'll find comparisons between CPU capabilities of each chip below. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. About Geekbench: Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and images , rendering, physics simulations, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images. The score breakdown gives specific metrics.

Karishma In Athleisure. Sports 3 hours ago.

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more. IP68 rating, wireless charging. But one traditional source of contention is that a Galaxy S phone in one region can have worse performance, battery life, and image quality than the same device in another market. This discrepancy exists because Samsung has usually offered two different chipsets in the Galaxy S series, depending on the region.

Snapdragon is in a long-standing competition with Exynos. Exynos processors are manufactured in-house by Samsung for use in their Samsung smartphones, with a few exceptions. Snapdragon SoCs are being manufactured by Qualcomm for use in third-party mobile devices. The majority of smartphone manufacturers are using Snapdragon as the leading SoC for their devices. This distinction is due to a deal between Samsung and Qualcomm that forces Samsung to use Snapdragon in its location. By reduced instructions, it means around only a million instructions every second. If we compare it with the 6th Gen Intel i7 k, it can perform over , million instructions every second. However, this large performance gap is because the 6th Gen Intel Chip is a lot bigger. The Exynos processors have also faced defeat from the Qualcomm Soc in terms of GPU performance and by a considerable margin. However, Samsung is looking forward to overcoming this gap with its upcoming Exynos , as it could with AMD graphics.

Snapdragon vs exynos processor

Given a lack of large architectural as well as process node improvements, the large performance improvements must thus come from large power increases. The Exynos improves dramatically over the Exynos in this regard, however the Snapdragon S21 barely budges the needle against its predecessor, posting roughly the same sustained performance figures as any other Snapdragon device such as the S20 Ultra. In GFXBench Aztec High, we see a similar story, where peak performance of both phones is much greater than before, however it quickly throttles onto mediocre figures. Both the Exynos and Snapdragon are showcasing outrageous peak power figures around 8W, which are figures that are simply impossible to sustain or dissipate in a phone. The phones quickly throttle down to below 4W — and fluctuate lower or higher depending on your environmental conditions. The p variant of Aztec largely looks the same in terms of ranking, with the Exynos posting a good generational upgrade in sustained performance, while the Snapdragon shows smaller gains. Throttling down, the Snapdragon takes the lead in terms of efficiency as seemingly it has a differently shaped power curve and benefits more at lower frequencies. Same story in Manhattan — good upgrades for the Exynos — although still not very competitive, while the Snapdragon is flat against most other Snapdragon phones. Throttling down again shows that the Snapdragon has a steeper power curve and becomes more efficient at lower frequency points.

What kills camo bloons in btd6

Read More. Exynos vs Snapdragon. Murder Mubarak BTS. But the Exynos variant definitely shows plenty more noise in low-light scenarios when you look a little closer. Dxomark tested both Galaxy S22 Ultra variants and dished out the same overall score. That would be bad news because, as a consumer, you want there to be as much competition as possible, so you can enjoy cheaper prices as companies compete for your dollar. After all, Exynos chips have historically proven to be grossly inferior to their Snapdragon counterparts. Samsung is one of the largest chip makers in the world. So even though Snapdragon chips are more powerful, no Pixel fan would give up Tensor for it. That's a pretty major improvement as expected but shows how improvements are beginning to slow, as eight generations on, we don't see an 8x improvement in single-core scores. Let's take a look at why the Exynos processor is important for both Samsung and Android. Without the Exynos lineup of chips, the semiconductor industry would lose a major competitor. Another area that sees differences between Exynos and Snapdragon variants is camera quality, as Dxomark and YouTuber Danny Winget showed that the Snapdragon-powered Galaxy S21 Ultra has better image quality than the Exynos model. Check out a comparison by Winget in this screenshot.

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more.

Our own testing showed that the Snapdragon variant offered better multi-core CPU performance and much better graphical performance, while the two were virtually tied in single-core benchmarks. These differences have resulted in enthusiasts urging Samsung to offer Galaxy flagships with the Snapdragon processor in more markets. The chipset also has a couple of features in common with the brand-new Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC, such as super-fast image generation and Zoom Anyplace camera tech. That would be bad news because, as a consumer, you want there to be as much competition as possible, so you can enjoy cheaper prices as companies compete for your dollar. The two SoCs were similarly matched in terms of CPU performance, with the Snapdragon variant edging ahead for single-core performance and the Exynos model pulling ahead on multi-core scores. Samsung is one of the largest chip makers in the world. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. In saying so, the two parties announced in April that they would be extending their deal. Babil Aces Casual Look. Let's take a detailed look into what each one of them is good for, and which one is more suitable for your use. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. Starting off with single and multi-core scores of and , respectively, we see massive leaps in both peaks with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Snapdragon In saying so, we also found that the Exynos variant throttled performance sooner. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of benchmarks run on each base device. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.