Terraform merge

Have a question about this project?

Collaborating around Infrastructure as Code IaC changes requires both code changes and expected infrastructure changes to be checked and approved. GitLab provides a solution to help collaboration around Terraform code changes and their expected effects using the merge request pages. Using the GitLab Terraform Report artifact , you can expose details from terraform plan runs directly into a merge request widget, enabling you to see statistics about the resources that Terraform creates, modifies, or destroys. For a quick setup, you should customize the pre-built image and rely on the gitlab-terraform and gitlab-tofu helpers. Create an alias for a specific jq command that parses out the information we want to extract from the terraform plan output:.

Terraform merge

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:. Hi dsiguero ,. I think the difference between your two cases here is the argument order. In your first example with a for expression you passed the variable value in the second argument, and so the null values for the unassigned attributes overrode the attributes of the same name in the first object. In the second example you wrote the variable first and then the literal object, so your fixed opt overrode the null. I think what you've observed here is that merge is considering whether the attributes are present, regardless of whether they are null. That's because merge was originally built for maps and so its support for merging objects takes a "map-like" viewpoint where it's the presence of the keys that matter. But in an object value all of the attributes specified in the type must always be present or else the value wouldn't be of the given type so when trying to substitute default values dynamically you would need to use a different strategy that checks for null values rather than for whether the attribute is present at all.

Using the GitLab Terraform Report artifactterraform merge, you can expose details from terraform plan runs directly into a merge request widget, enabling you to see statistics about the resources that Terraform creates, modifies, terraform merge destroys.

Functions in Terraform allow you to manipulate data, perform calculations, and create more dynamic configurations. They are an essential part of the Terraform language and can be used within expressions to achieve various tasks. In this article, we will take a look at what the Terraform merge function is and how to use it, with a few useful practical examples showing how to merge lists of maps, lists of objects, and apply merged lists of tags to cloud resources. Terraform merge is a built-in function. The merge function takes an arbitrary number of maps or objects and returns a single map or object that contains a merged set of elements from all arguments. Keep in mind that the merge function is available in Terraform versions 0. If you are using an earlier version of Terraform, you might need to use alternative methods like the concat function or the for expression to achieve similar merging behavior.

Collaborating around Infrastructure as Code IaC changes requires both code changes and expected infrastructure changes to be checked and approved. GitLab provides a solution to help collaboration around Terraform code changes and their expected effects using the merge request pages. Using the GitLab Terraform Report artifact , you can expose details from terraform plan runs directly into a merge request widget, enabling you to see statistics about the resources that Terraform creates, modifies, or destroys. For a quick setup, you should customize the pre-built image and rely on the gitlab-terraform and gitlab-tofu helpers. Create an alias for a specific jq command that parses out the information we want to extract from the terraform plan output:. Define a script that runs terraform plan and terraform show.

Terraform merge

Quick Fix: Implement setunion function to unify multiple sets of objects into a single set, preserving the unique elements of each input set. You have two lists of objects in Terraform, each representing a set of variables with their respective values and workspace names. You need to merge these lists in a manner where any custom variables override common variables if they share workspace names and variable names, resulting in a single list of objects with the merged data. The final output should prioritize custom variables over common variables. The resulting set will contain all the variables from both sets, with any duplicates removed. To achieve the desired merging behavior, we can leverage maps instead of lists.

Old meucci pool cues

Since the focus of the Terraform language isn't data structure manipulation, we'd ideally like to add only a single function that addresses this family of use-cases, but we'll have to consider what all of the use-cases are first before we can see if that's possible. This setting ensures artifacts are accessible only to GitLab administrators and project members with at least the Reporter role. It's common for data structures in Terraform to include lists and maps of nested objects, like the following example variable:. We're using strings to escape the challenges of working with complex types. That's because merge was originally built for maps and so its support for merging objects takes a "map-like" viewpoint where it's the presence of the keys that matter. In the meantime I recommend using coalesce , but that does mean you will need to handle the default for each attribute separately because it's the attributes that are null, not the object itself. Hi dsiguero ,. Already have an account? Already have an account? Treat the element indices as if they were mapping keys and do the deep merge operation on the pairs with matching indices across both sequences. In the second example you wrote the variable first and then the literal object, so your fixed opt overrode the null.

I would like to remote index of arrays from the result and to concatenate only maps into a big one as shown below:. I think the key here would be to use merge instead of flatten , because merge can combine multiple objects or maps together to produce an object or map, which matches your desired result.

References The current documentation doesn't mention nested properties at all, so if this work is rejected, it may be worth making a note of this behavior in the documentation. If you didn't find what you were looking for, search the docs. Sorry, something went wrong. It feels more like the second arguments root level properties just overwrite those of the first argument. Using the GitLab Terraform Report artifact , you can expose details from terraform plan runs directly into a merge request widget, enabling you to see statistics about the resources that Terraform creates, modifies, or destroys. Hi apparentlymart , thank you for the very in-depth research. I'd be curious to hear if that specific behavior is important for your use-case, or merely a case of "it doesn't matter what it does so I just arbitrarily choose this option". You signed in with another tab or window. So for map values that are objects and maps, it could make sense to think of merge behavior as a bug but HC will almost surely say it is like this by design and therefore not a bug, PLUS and more importantly "fixing" this would break backward compatibility since by now too many people rely on the shallow merge of merge. Sorry, something went wrong. Propose functionality by submitting a feature request. Example 2: Terraform merge lists of objects Terraform does not have a built-in function to directly merge lists of objects.