Tug normative values

Purpose: The Tug normative values Up and Go TUG test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade ages,years were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, tug normative values, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down.

Background and purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is widely employed in the examination of elders, but definitive normative reference values are lacking. This meta-analysis provided such values by consolidating data from multiple studies. Methods: Studies reporting TUG times for apparently healthy elders were identified through the on-line search of bibliographic databases. Study specifics and data were consolidated and examined for homogeneity. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. Although the data contributing to this mean were homogeneous, data for individuals who could be categorized by age were more homogeneous. Conclusions: The reference values presented, though obtained from studies with clear differences, provide a standard to which patient performance can be compared.

Tug normative values

Toll-Free U. Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life. Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. Instrument Details. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process. Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please email us! Flansbjer et al, ; 7 days between assessments, 16 to 18 months from stroke onset to initial assessment, Chronic Stroke. TUG should be used with caution in people with poorer walking ability. Schenkman et al. Bennie et al 20 PD, mean age 68 Predicted Fall Risk: Sensitivity: 0. Convergent Validity Evidence - Moderate to good correlation with the following measures:. Due to variability in patient scores across administrations, a specific cut-off value may be of limited value for predicting falls in fail elderly adults living in residential care facilities. Abu Hilal, M.

Your Support Matters Body Your gift of Ability affects everything we do every day at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab — from the highest-quality clinical care and groundbreaking research to community programs that improve quality of life, tug normative values. Agosto - Septiembre

The TUG test provides a measure of global ambulation skills and its total score has been successfully related with functionality and other important health variables in older adults. Reliable norms are needed for adults 50 years and older that allow the early identification and intervention in motor disturbances. The study was carried out with adults from Galicia and Valencia living in the community. A total of Spanish community-living participants, aged from 50 to 90 years and functionality preserved were assessed through the implementation of a cross-sectional design. Health, comorbidity, physical activity, cognitive status, functionality measures and TUG test scores were obtained. TUG scores were successfully predicted by age and gender, and significantly correlated with cognitive status and comorbidity. TUG norms were calculated by age-group for women and men.

Simple test used to estimate the risk of falls. The Timed Up and Go test, also known as the TUG test, is a simple evaluative test used to measure your functional mobility. The TUG test measures how long it takes you to stand up, walk a distance of 10 feet, turn, walk back, and sit down again. The TUG test is most often used in physical therapy to give your therapist an idea of how safely you can move around. It can also be used by your healthcare provider to estimate your risk of falling and your ability to maintain balance while walking. This article looks at the TUG test, its purpose, and how results are interpreted. The TUG test can help a healthcare provider understand how well you are able to get around. It may be used during your first visit with a physical therapist and during your treatment to help measure your response to therapy. It is also recommended as a routine screening test for falls by the American Geriatric Society. The TUG test is frequently used in older adults as it is easy to administer and can be completed by most people.

Tug normative values

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. Purpose: The Timed Up and Go TUG test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade ages , , , years were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors.

Lincoln tomahawk 625

BMC Geriatr, 14 , pp. Our norms were closer to the reference values for older adult population obtained by meta-analytical procedures. Phillips, V. Find it on PubMed Bennie, S. Find it on PubMed Foreman, K. Charlson, P. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing, 44 , pp. Gill-Body, K. Find it on PubMed Morris, S. Although the data contributing to this mean were homogeneous, data for individuals who could be categorized by age were more homogeneous.

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. We aimed to provide updated reference values for TUG performance for the community-dwelling older population according to age and sex, and according to the presence of arthritis and non-communicable diseases NCDs.

Through the implementation of a cross-sectional design, seven age groups 50—54, 55—59, 60—64, 65—69, 70—74, 75—79, and 80—90 were established and gender of participants was considered in recruitment procedures to yield a balanced sample. Methods: Studies reporting TUG times for apparently healthy elders were identified through the on-line search of bibliographic databases. Find it on PubMed Tanji, H. Gerontologist, 50 , pp. Lam, T. Find it on PubMed Dibble, L. Nayak, B. Find it on PubMed Caixeta, G. Instruments to assess mobility limitation in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Find it on PubMed Steffen, T. Find it on PubMed Siggeirsdottir, K. Descriptive statistics for age, functionality, cognitive status, health, and physical activity are shown in Table 1. TUG scores showed significant relationships with cognitive status and comorbidity. Balash, Y. AbilityLab menu.